The Immigration Dilemma

The issue of illegal immigration has clearly become a contentious issue in our society. I hear people discuss the issue from a political point of view, an economic point of view, and a personal point of view. I see the arguments getting more heated as the stakes continue to get higher for all of us. When I listen to these arguments, I see that the arguments stem from two very different psychological theories and believe viewing the issue through this lens can help us resolve it.

On the one hand is a point of view that says those who break the law need to be punished; the immigrants need to be sent back to where they came from. On the other hand, is a point of view that says such an action will break up families, send hard-working people back to unsafe homelands, and wreck our economy. The first perspective is rooted in a behaviorist philosophy, the second in a cognitive one.

Behaviorist’s focus is on behavior and its consequences: a behavior that is rewarded is repeated; one that is ignored is reduced to the point of elimination. The most scientific of all the psychological perspectives, behaviorists consider only what can be observed and measured. That simple principle leads them to focus on behavior and eliminate thought and emotion as factors that must be considered. They demonstrate that a rat or a dog will greet us at the door, sit by our feet, walk by our side, because we train them to do so by feeding them. In other words, behavior is the consequence of rewards. There are no shades of gray.

What does this have to do with illegal immigration? Well, for a behaviorist, we must provide consequences for an action or the action will continue to occur. A behaviorist’s view would go something like this: If America allows the illegal immigrants to stay, then we reward them for breaking the rules of entry into our country. Behaviorists contend that they will simply continue to do what we’ve trained them to do. In other words, this “law breaking” behavior, once rewarded, would be generalized, resulting in other laws being broken. In order to prevent this, all who have come illegally must have a consequence so that they (and others) learn to obey the law.

On the other hand, the cognitive perspective believes that a person’s thoughts about the future determine current behavior. For example, if a person believes s/he will succeed in college (a future goal), s/he’ll enroll (a current behavior). If a person believes s/he will not succeed, s/he will not enroll. For cognitive psychologists, everyone is a scientist collecting evidence to confirm or disconfirm their beliefs. The world, consequently, is always a shade of gray.

From this perspective, illegal immigration can be considered a series of thoughts. Americans holding this view think that we do not have to punish those who came illegally; we can instead control current illegal immigration by giving a reasonable goal for future entry. That is, if people know that the process will be streamlined and fair (if we give out enough work visas, for example), they will stop coming illegally. Cognitive theorists would consider the emotions involved in separating families. They would consider the thoughts that were involved in choosing to come illegally – the decision to leave their families behind, to risk all the danger in getting across several borders, the thought that their only chance for a better life was to come to America. These thoughts lead to the idea that illegal immigrants are a part of our heritage; we draw in those who are in search of a better life.

While I have a theoretical preference, I respect the other side. Both have valid points and both have arguments that are worth addressing. It is not until we develop a cognitive-behavioral perspective that the issue can be resolved.

It is time for us to solve this issue – to decide if we believe that humans are the sum total of repeatedly rewarded behaviors or if humans are the sum total of their thoughts, emotions, and behaviors. It is time for us to stop the name-calling and finger pointing and move, instead, towards working to find a solution that addresses the very real problem of violence so severe that humans would go to such extremes to escape it. It is time to come up with a humane plan.

 

 

If you enjoy reading my posts, please subscribe using the sign-up box at the bottom of the page. Once you sign up, you will receive a confirming email. When you respond to that confirmation email, you will get updates on any new items I post. It is my hope that these blogs are a starting point for great discussions and shared ideas. I look forward to reading the comments you post.

 

6 thoughts on “The Immigration Dilemma

  1. I think your conclusion exposes an additional weakness in the behavioral approach. If people are quite literally fleeing for their lives, does increasing the penalty for breaking US law really act as a deterrent? What would you risk to save your life and the lives of your loved ones? If the necessary penalty exceeds what we are willing to tolerate in a free and just society, then the behavioral approach fails to offer any viable solution.

  2. Great post. I agree when you said, “we develop a cognitive-behavioral perspective that the issue can be resolved.” This topic is a very touchy topic because this is an ongoing issue in the U.S and it needs to be solved. As a behaviorist following the rules, is how you have to live because you can’t break the laws. Many people see you a racist just cause you want the best and you want to follow the rules. I believe that we should have a cognitive behavior. Why, we should not let people just cross the borders very easily, but we also should not break up these families and whatever they do and send the hard workers back to their countries. This blog post shows both sides of the story and I agree 100% with you on everything you said above. Hopefully the U.S can find away to have a universal solution to this ongoing problem that is happening when it comes to immigration. Once again, great blog post! Can’t wait to read other upcoming post Dr. Urban.

  3. In the U.S. we have all noticed by now, that our country is divided. Day by day, the problem is getting worse. I think many people have had hidden thoughts and opinions about immigrants that are now unleashing. I believe we should take preventative measures to control the amount of people entering the country, however we should not disperse the hard working families just because a simple one time criminal offense. I believe if the person is a career criminal or has a long criminal history, then s/he should be sent back to s/he country.

  4. Illegal immigration is a ongoing issue and will continue to be an issue especially since the new administration has decided to “tighten up” on this global issue. I think of the issue from a personal point of view. We will often agree that only when you experience something, then it affects you. Although some people think that immigration does not affect them, it certainly does.

    I think that if illegal immigrants breaks the law, they should be punished. I also think that illegal immigrants should be deported if they are a threat to society and do not abide by the law of the land. It clearly doesn’t matter if it’s the United States or not . All countries have laws that we must abide by.

    The issue of illegal entry into the US has been around for a long time. As such I agree with Professor Urban when she states that there is a need to “control current illegal immigration” (Urban). I strongly feel that this issue will be around for many more years.

    Lawyers will continue to make money representing illegal immigrants. And the cycle continues. Above all, it affects all of us

  5. I totally agree with this post, I have managed tl understand and see what you meant how people see immigrants and what they believe should happen if they are not capable of acting correctly while in this country. Although there are people who believe an immigrant should be judged by a behavioral perspective here in the U.S. there are still peoole who simply want each immigrant gone from the U.S. due to the rise in racial discrimination and simply believing that this country is better off without illegal immigrants. Although many may agree with that accusation, Others are able to see those same illegal immigrants who work hard and have an overall goal to have a better future for themselves and for their children and fight against the peoole who want them out.

  6. I found this article very informative because I was able to catch a glimpse of both sides from the article. I don’t agree with sending the illegal immigrants back to where they came from before because some immigrants do follow rules and try to live the “American Dream”. But allowing illegal immigrants has a downside because some will take advantage of this opportunity and will lead to numerous repercussions. In my opinion you should just monitor the illegal immigrants which will help to see which ones are really the trouble makers of today’s society.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *